Circular Debt 101: The Multi-Billion-Dollar Problem Behind Your Power Bill

If you've ever wondered why electricity tariffs keep rising even as Pakistan's power generation capacity has expanded, the answer usually traces back to a single structural problem: circular debt.

What circular debt actually is

Circular debt refers to the unpaid, cascading obligations that build up across Pakistan's power sector supply chain. In simplified terms: power distribution companies often collect less revenue from consumers than the actual cost of the electricity they deliver — due to a mix of unrecovered bills, transmission and distribution losses, and government-subsidized tariffs. That shortfall means the distribution companies can't fully pay the power generation companies. The generation companies, in turn, fall behind on payments to fuel suppliers. Each link in the chain owes the next, and the total unpaid balance — the "circular debt" — keeps growing.

Why it keeps growing instead of getting paid down

A few structural factors make circular debt difficult to resolve through occasional cash injections alone:

• Transmission and distribution losses. A meaningful share of generated electricity is lost before it ever reaches a paying customer, whether through technical inefficiencies in aging infrastructure or non-technical losses like unbilled and stolen electricity.
• Under-recovery of billed amounts. Distribution companies frequently collect less than 100% of what they bill, particularly in regions with weaker enforcement capacity.
• Tariff differential subsidies. Government subsidies intended to keep electricity affordable for certain consumer categories are meant to be reimbursed to distribution companies — but reimbursement has often lagged, adding to the accumulated shortfall.
• Capacity payments. Pakistan pays fixed "capacity charges" to power plants regardless of how much electricity is actually used, a structure tied to earlier-era power purchase agreements designed to attract investment in generation capacity.

What the number actually is right now

Concretely: the power sector's circular debt stood at roughly Rs 1.675 trillion at the end of FY2025-26 (June 30, 2026). Combined with the gas sector's separate circular debt of about Rs 3.611 trillion, total energy-sector circular debt reached approximately Rs 5.29 trillion by mid-2026. That power-sector figure, from the Power Division's reply to the National Assembly, is Rs61 billion higher than a year earlier and above the Rs1.614 trillion ceiling Pakistan agreed with the IMF for June 30, 2026. Other reporting puts it higher still: Profit, citing official sources, reported Rs1.835 trillion, with officials blaming about Rs200 billion in unpaid K-Electric dues and weak distribution-company finances. The two figures haven't been reconciled publicly, which is why we cite dated, sourced numbers rather than a single headline trend.

Why this matters beyond the balance sheet

Circular debt isn't just an accounting abstraction — it has direct, visible consequences. Periodic electricity tariff hikes are frequently tied to circular-debt reduction commitments made as part of IMF program conditions. Cash-strapped generation and fuel companies sometimes reduce output or maintenance, contributing to load-shedding. And the debt itself represents a significant, recurring drain on public finances that could otherwise fund other priorities.

What reducing it durably would involve

Energy sector analysts generally converge on a similar list of structural fixes, distinct from one-off cash injections that temporarily "settle" the debt without addressing its causes:

1. Reducing transmission and distribution losses through infrastructure upgrades and stronger enforcement against theft and non-payment.
2. Right-sizing generation capacity and renegotiating capacity payment structures where possible, to reduce fixed costs that accrue regardless of demand.
3. Timely and predictable tariff adjustments, rather than large, delayed jumps that are politically difficult and economically disruptive.
4. Faster reimbursement of subsidies owed to distribution companies, so shortfalls don't compound while awaiting budget allocations.
5. Privatization or restructuring of underperforming distribution companies, an approach that has been debated for years but faces significant political and labor-related hurdles.

Circular debt has been treated, at various points, as an emergency to be managed rather than a structural problem to be solved. Each round of debt settlement without addressing the underlying causes has tended to see the balance climb right back up in the following years — which is precisely why so many energy economists argue that piecemeal fixes will keep falling short.

Build Better Pakistan's Energy Desk tracks circular debt trends and power-sector reform proposals on an ongoing basis.